My Black jack code

Blog about Black jack, Black jack code and playing black jack

Friday, February 02, 2007

Life Lessons From Blackjack

Having played a just amount of blackjack (I learned card numeration when I was 21), I’ve noticed some interesting forms in the manner people play the game that look to reflect bigger life patterns.

Background Story

Feel free to jump ahead to the “Interesting Observations” subdivision if you just desire to read the lessons. This portion simply supplies some background information for the curious.

When I was 21 old age old and life in Los Angeles, some friends and I decided to take a weekend trip to Las Vegas, my first trip there as an adult. I decided to read up on some of the casino games before I went, so I could be prepared.

I quickly learned that most of the casino games were skewed to give the house an advantage — how partial is that? — but blackjack was supposedly beatable if you learned a technique known as card counting. So I bought a book on blackjack, learned the rules of the game, memorized the basic strategy, and then studied a simple +/- card numeration system. It took a heck of a batch of pattern and was boring to learn, but I eventually felt comfortable with it. Then I was off to Vegas to seek my fortune with a humongous $40 of gambling money. Not much of a bankroll I know….

My friends and I stayed at the Aladdin Hotel (before it was demolished and rebuilt). Since there are many fluctuations on blackjack rules, I scoped out the nearby casinos to happen one that had the best player-favorable conditions. That turned out to be the Barbary Seashore on the Strip (across the street from Caesar’s Palace), which had a nice double-deck game with broad rules (the fewer the decks, the better for the player, all else beingness equal). Asset they offered a $2 minimum, so my $40 had a opportunity of lasting. $400 would have got been a more than adequate bankroll for that limit, but at the time I didn’t desire to put on the line $400.

I felt a spot intimidated playing blackjack for the first time in a existent unrecorded casino. But I trusted I was as prepared as I could be, so I sat down and dove in. The readying paid off, and after a few proceedings I began to experience at ease. Aside from making a few minor etiquette mistakes, I played my hands perfectly and had no problem keeping path of the cards. After a few hours of playing I had turned my $40 into $165 while betting only $2-10 per hand… making more than adequate to pay for my trip expenses. This was during the time when you could still happen counters for about $5.

After that first trip I was hooked on the game, not so much for the money but for the challenge of it. Card numeration appealed to the swot in me far more than than the entrepreneur. I made many tax return trips to Vegas and played in tons of different casinos all around the city. One of my favourite places to play was the Frontier Hotel, which used to have got a single-deck game with generously player-favorable conditions. That was very moneymaking until they changed their rules, like many other casinos eventually did, probably in big portion owed to card counters.

Between Vegas trips I studied blackjack and card numeration ever more than deeply. I read 10-12 books on the topic and mastered different numeration systems (Thorpe, Uston, Revere, etc.). I practiced advanced counting systems that maintain a side-count of aces. I drilled myself until I could number down a deck of cards in under 14 seconds. I learned to change the play of hands according to the count, memorized optimal schemes for different rule sets, and learned the nuances of the game that would increase my border even the slightest degree. We’re talking a sum border of maybe 1%.

As I gained experience, I became comfortable doing all these mental gymnastics under existent casino conditions. I learned to play cat-and-mouse with the cavity bosses. I even got a batch of comped repasts for myself and my girlfriend (now my wife), although we got tired of eating at the same places over and over. Casinos have got grown stingier with the comps, but back then you could play $5 blackjack for about 30 proceedings and acquire a free counter for two without much trouble (and without being asked to fall in a players club).

Card numeration isn’t illegal, but casinos will kick you out for it and sometimes ban you for good. Fortunately I was never banished for life anywhere, and I was only kicked out once (from the Barbary Seashore of all places). Mostly this was because I played only in the $5-25 or $10-50 scope of betting… too little for the casinos to care much. At that degree I certainly wasn’t going to acquire rich, but I was doing this more than for merriment than for profit.

The amusing thing is that now I dwell in Vegas, I hardly play blackjack at all… I’ve played only twice this whole twelvemonth for a sum of about 45 proceedings (and won both times). Even though I establish that card numeration worked, I never seriously considered trying to do a calling out of it. For one it’s very difficult work, and for another it doesn’t lend anything. I still bask blackjack as a recreation sometimes, and I like meeting people from around the world at the table, but I wouldn’t desire to seek to do a life from it.

Interesting Observations

While learning to get the hang the game of blackjack, I made a figure of observations in the manner players approached the game, especially the direct contrast between novitiate and expert players. Most people who play blackjack are novitiate or intermediate players. During all the times I played blackjack, I felt I had identified another card counter at the same table with me on lone two occasions. In both states of affairs we could each state the other individual was counting cards, and we gave each other knowing looks. But card counters are extremely rare as a per centum of entire players… way, manner below 1%.

1. Novices will do right determinations most of the time. About 80-90% of the time, novitiates will play their hands the same manner an expert player would. But the house additions a large advantage on the 10-20% of determinations they don’t do correctly. That 10-20% do all the difference in the world between winning and losing because it’s cumulative. How is this different from other parts of life? An other 10% do a large difference. Eat 10% less food, and you lose weight. Save 10% of your income, and you retire a millionaire. Spend 10% of your twenty-four hours on some cardinal goal, and by the end of the year, you’ve written a book, started a business, or establish a mate.

2. Novices lose aureate opportunities. Novitiate blackjack players will almost invariably play their hands too conservatively. They’ll base too often when they should hit, and they’ll neglect to duplicate down and split braces as often as they should. They waver to hit 16 against a dealer’s Seven or to divide a brace of 2s against a dealer’s 4. They give up a batch more to the house by playing defensively, trying not to bust. But expert players work every chance to maximise their wins, meaning that they’ll two-base hit and split far more than often when the likelihood prefer doing so. Expert players will flop more often, but they’ll also hit their large hands more often. You see a similar form in life too. High winners will flop more often, while underperformers play too conservatively, afraid to take calculated hazards for fearfulness of losing what they have. In blackjack, it’s those divides and dual down hands where you do your existent money. Novitiate players believe it’s the ten-ace blackjack manus that’s the best — the bonded win. Expert players cognize it’s those hands where you divide braces 4x and dual down on each 1 and see the trader bust, winning 8x your original stake (but also risking 8x) instead of the mere 1.5x you acquire from a made blackjack. The large wins come up disguised as refuse hands, like a brace of 3s. So it is in life — existent chances come up disguised as problems.

3. Novices don’t set in the time to fully understand the game. Expert players understand the game inside and out because they’ve invested many long hours studying it. Experts work harder. Novices have got a strong apprehension of certain parts, but their cognition is very fuzzed in other areas. They often acquire confused on how to manage states of affairs that originate infrequently. But eventually those states of affairs make arise, and that’s where novitiates lose. Novices can’t manage the exclusions as well as the experts. But aside from a deficiency of understanding, novitiates also have got some false understanding. If you could play blackjack and be dealt an 18 every hand, would you make it? A novitiate will usually state yes, thinking 18 to be a pretty good manus because a trader have to hit 19-21 to beat it. But an expert player cognizes that 18 will lose more than often than it will win — if you have got an 18 every hand, in the long run, you’ll lose money. Experts have got a more than accurate apprehension of the strengths and failings of each manus than novices. It’s the same with life. Novices don’t take the time to get the hang the basics, like goal-setting, time management, motivation, and self-discipline. They make all right most days, but whenever an exclusion happens such as as the loss of a job, they’re thrown completely out of whack, and it takes them a long time to recover. You can throw a bankruptcy or a divorcement at certain people, and they retrieve quickly and then maintain on going. But novitiates are more than likely to let impermanent reverses to float into long-term ruin.

4. Experts are more than disciplined. Novitiate players be given to play their hands inconsistently. When the same state of affairs arises, they often do different determinations with no rime or reason. They exhibit mediocre subject and will often imbibe alcoholic beverage while playing. Experts understand that you can do the right determination and still lose, but they concentrate on making right decisions, not on trying to coerce a peculiar outcome. Experts have got the forbearance to cognize that making right determinations is all it takes to win in the long run. You see this in existent life too, don’t you? Achievers be given to be more than consistent in making determinations and taking action; they concentrate their energy. Underachievers, however, waste material their energy, never applying adequate military unit in a consistent way to convey about a breakthrough.

5. Private triumph predates public victory. Novices larn how to play in the casino. Experts larn how to play at place and then use their cognition in the casino. Experts pass a batch more time practicing, which takes enormous patience. Their existent triumphs are unseen. Talented people who execute in public have got often spent many old age honing their accomplishments in private.

#2 is the observation I happen most applicable to business. Even winning blackjack players will lose most of their hands. They typically win about 48% of the hands they play. That’s just the nature of the game; you’re going to lose more than hands than you win. But on norm the winning players will wager more than money on the 48% of winning hands than they will on the 52% of losing hands. These larger stakes are made in two ways. First, with card numeration you can acknowledge when the deck composition is in your favour and when you’re More likely to win than lose, so you increase the amount of your initial bet. But also you can acknowledge states of affairs to duplicate down or split braces where you can increase your stake after you see your first two cards.

Novice players lose chances in these same two ways then. They don’t cognize when the likelihood are in their favor, so they don’t cognize when the statuses are right for a larger initial bet. And secondly, after they see their first two cards, they don’t cognize when it’s A good thought to set more than money out. And by missing these two key opportunities, they lose money in the long run, typically giving the house around a 5-8% edge.

How makes this lesson use to existent life? Life isn’t about the measure of successes and failures you experience. You also have got to see the magnitude. When you comprehend the statuses of your life are mature for success in some area, that’s the time to wager big. Asset there are also states of affairs where you have got the opportunity to see what results you’re getting, and if they demo promise, you can raise your stake even higher.

For example, say your end is to happen a long-term relationship. When the statuses in your life propose you have got A better opportunity of succeeding at this end than you did in the past, that’s a great time to force yourself. Perhaps you have got a stable occupation and money in the depository financial institution and your wellness is great. It’s time to place a large stake by focusing difficult on your human relationship goal. Go out on a batch of dates. Ask! Don’t sit down on the outs of-bounds waiting and lose the opportunity. It will be a batch harder to accomplish this end under less optimal conditions.

And then when you happen a individual who looks compatible with you, dual down and raise your bet. Find ways to pass more than time with that person, and set your lesser ends on the dorsum burner. Don’t disregard the chance to turn closer. Strike while the Fe is hot. Rich Person a batch of merriment together. Construct your human relationship when the statuses make it easy to do so.

When the statuses in your life are right to seek out chances instead of merely holding your ground, acquire out there and take advantage of them! And when you start getting promising results in some country that show you the likelihood are in your favor, pushing yourself to capitalise on the state of affairs as best you can. Don’t sit down around waiting and waiting.

Sometimes the statuses in your life aren’t right for going after opportunities. Maybe it’s A battle just to hold your land or to delve yourself out of a cavity you happen yourself in. Be patient and remain your course. Eventually there will come up a time where things are going your manner again. And when that happens, make NOT let yourself to be complacent. Everyone loses when the deck is stacked against them. But the greatest losings come up not from the no-win state of affairs but from the could’ve-won-but-failed-to-act situation. Could’ve started the concern but didn’t. Could’ve gotten the day of the month but didn’t. Could’ve lost the weight but didn’t.

As in the game of blackjack, the could’ve-but-didn’ts are the greatest also-rans in life. Don’t fall in them.

Here’s A related to station you may enjoy: Life Lessons From Poker


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Digg ItDel.icio.us
Furl ItReddit
Spurl ItBlink It
GoogleWists
My WebSimpy
RSS ATOM
Powered By
widgetmate.com
Sponsored By
Apply for Credit Cards

Black jack code Archives

March 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?